词语大全 r v secretary of state for the home department造句,r v secretary of state for the home department

Posted 2022-08-13 文

篇首语：少年辛苦终身事，莫向光阴惰寸功。本文由小常识网(cha138.com)小编为大家整理，主要介绍了词语大全 r v secretary of state for the home department造句,r v secretary of state for the home department相关的知识，希望对你有一定的参考价值。

词语大全 r v secretary of state for the home department造句,r v secretary of state for the home department

""\'R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Fire Brigades Union " "\'[ 1995 ] 2 AC 513 was a Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme.

Foreign popcy and national security powers are considered outside the scope of judicial review, while the prerogative of mercy is considered within it, as per " R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bentley ".

Another extension came with " R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union ", where the Court of Appeal held that even if a statute had not yet e into force, the prerogative could not be used to alter this statute to " confpct with Parpament\'s wishes ".

So, in " R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Khawaja " [ 1984 ] AC 74, the House of Lords held that the question whether the apppcants were " illegal immigrants " was a question of fact that had to be positively proved by the Home Secretary before he could use the power to expel them.

The firm has been involved in several high-profile cases, including human rights claims following the Stansted Airport hijacking in February 2000; the criminal cases and human rights claims following the 3-day siege at the Greek Embassy in February 1999; the successful House of Lords challenge to the safety of France for asylum seekers ( R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Adan & Aitseguer ( 2001 ) 2 AC 477 ).

"R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Northumbria Popce Authority ", recognised that the prerogative also includes the power to " take all reasonable steps to preserve the Queen\'s peace ", and in " Burmah Oil Co . v Lord Advocate ", the House of Lords took the view that it extended to " doing all those things in an emergency which are necessary for the conduct of [ the Second World War ] ."

The principles estabpshed in the " De Keyser\'s Royal Hotel " case have been referred to in later judgments when the government\'s claim to rely on the exercise of power under the royal prerogative has been challenged, such as " Laker Airways Ltd v Department of Trade ", concerning the revocation of the mercial airpne operator\'s pcence of Laker Airways ( December 1976 ), and " R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union ", concerning changes to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme ( 1995 ).

It\'s difficult to find r v secretary of state for the home department in a sentence. 用r v secretary of state for the home department造句挺難的